the question is: are you? so far i've only seen you deny any useful feedback given to you by 100%.
how old are you? based on my limited experience majority of the people don't know much about science and don't have the intellectual capacity to actually have their own opinions about anything. it's way easier to observe this when it comes to "taboo" topics like the actual reasoning behind attraction. excluding the recent blackpill trend on TikTok, there should be something weird (not necessarily in a negative way) about you if you spend any time thinking about these topics.
he’s not that weird tbh
he's just a troll like me. I think @QuantativeAnalyticalBS actually believes in his theories.
he’s not a troll
you are right. i'm 38 and i had my personal outcast experiences when i was young and got kinda blackpilled even before the term existed. as a result i took measures back then to ascend to normie tier.
You are delusional.
That's exactly what you did when you linked a chart with no data set and then another study you never read that was easily proven false. I only get mad when stupid morons like you comment on my post wasting my time and everyone else's. Like I said, get educated before commenting. The study I quoted was directly linked from the most reputable source. I was reading into the methodology and not just taking the scientists word for his conclusions on the science behind the attractiveness for height.
I stopped reading instantly. How can you be this retarded?
It means you're really smart. I'm really impressed. You were born with good genes, genius IQ
geniuses generally find it hard to get along with others
Forum needs to have all sorts of people. When us, retards, will say something wrong, @QuantativeAnalyticalBS will correct us
Yawn.
Not that weird? Have you looked in the mirror? You're a rent boy who gets flown out and then get bummed by wealthy homosexual Jew clients etc. You can't get any weirder than that...
Thats why i got banned, i cant shitpost anywhere
i’d say i’m pretty normal
me too
regarding the bumble chart that i posted: it said that the source was statista and i simply didn't invest the money to verify it just for a discussion in a forum with some incel i don't know. there are tons of bumble statistics posted on statista, but they're all hidden behind a paywall and you have to pay 500$ to unlock them. so we don't know if this data is really there or not. thus i already agreed twice that it can be discarded. what more do you want?
based tbh. id do gay for pay
How much money for you to suck my 7 inch white cock?
atleast 5k
Price is good. But I cum in mouth
no i didn’t ban him jfl
you dont get laid even with selfimprovement jfl
So the rumors are true?
Until you can present the data for the chart, you have no valid argument.
I disproved the study you used as evidence to counter my post in under 5 minutes. You're still unable to admit when you are wrong because you're a moron who's beneath me intellectually speaking.
The study I listed has been trialled and tested withstanding hard criticism. The failed study you've linked was easily falsifiable. The way they collected the data was flawed. The male participants self reported their height, thus the data is worthless.
I have standards, unlike you, pencil dick boy.
i'm not gonna pay 500$ for this so yes, i agree.
what's your degree? your I/O mindset gives me the impression that you are lacking some basic knowledge about social science.
do you have a source for this? or is this your general description for peer reviews?
if self reported data was worthless we wouldn't even have regular voting polls because their outcome would be random.
I never questioned the validity of self reporting per say. Only in this case when there's an inherent bias among men to lie about their height to exacerbate their attractiveness to the opposite sex.
Cambridge University press featured the study in their summary of female height preference. You can't get better than that.
i don't know this summary article but if your theory is based on this study, larger studies would have to be conducted to prove it. even only to consider it representative for a country like france an adequate sample would usually be around 1000 participants to reduce error margin (we only have 100 females here).
It's not my theory. It's the general theory in the field.
