The best way to geomax

[14passport]

There's too much focus on the countries someone will do the best, and not enough on what they are looking for.

1. How many girls do you need? Define what you need from fucking a different girl every night to having a longterm girlfriend
2. What kind of girls do you like? SEA vs East Asia vs Europe vs LATAM vs Africa
3. How much do you want to spend per month?
4. What kind of lifestyle do you like?

Define all these criteria and find the city that adjusts the most to it.
What's the point of going to Thailand and complain 24/7 about the girls being ugly and gold diggers.
It's not always about having 100s of matches, that's only useful if you want to fuck as many as possible. But it's useless if you are matching with girls you don't even like and just want to find a longterm girlfriend.

 

[AlexBrown84]

i need a monthly adventure

 

[Rance]

I like analytical posts like these. There are a large number of factors to consider. Imo, what separates geomaxxers from other "passport bros" or sexpats is the prioritization of sexual market value.

SMV has a demand side and a supply side:

• Demand: Go to locations where your own SMV is maximized. Everyone has strengths and weaknesses to their character, like a role-playing game. Go to places where your strengths are emphasized and your weaknesses are covered. If you are tall and buff but have an ugly face, go to places where macho guys are valued (e.g., Latin America). If you are short and frail but have a pretty boy face, go to places where such cuter features are valued (e.g., Japan). It is helpful to think in archetypes. For example, I fit the archetype of "pale skinned, blond hair blue eyes skinny guy". Find what yours is, emulate successful people of your archetype, and travel to locations that suit it.
  
  
• Supply (A/Male): Go to locations where the SMV of your male competitors is minimized. Find places where the desires of women are mismatched with the local supply. For example, the Philippines is a popular destination due to a Supply (A) vulnerability. What is this? The women value tall men with light skin, light hair, and light eyes. The local men are famously short and have dark features. There is no glut of desired features; there is a low Supply (A). Note that the "local supply" can refer to both indigenous people and expats. Overtourism will be an issue for this metric, although I don't personally believe that overtourism is an issue anywhere outside of Thailand.
  
  
• Supply (B/Female): Go to locations where the SMV of your desired female partners is minimized. This is the point that people miss most often. If you like thick girls with tanned skin, go to a place where woman are valued for being thin and having light skin. And vice versa. The relative SMV of the women you will date will decrease as a result. This is the status quo in Asia, but foreigners don't even realize it. If you look around, you will notice many expats dating slightly heavier girls with darker skin. In Western beauty standards, these are high SMV, but in Asia they are low SMV. The expats are taking advantage of the lesser competition from the Asian men as well as the lower self-esteem of their partners.

I wrote this in a bit of a hurry. There is definitely more to consider and everyone will have a different take on it. But in general, if you consider these supply and demand mechanics, you are a geomaxxer. If you think more in terms of monetary discrepancy, you are a passport bro/sexpat.

As the great RR said, you do not travel because the women are different... you travel because the competition is different.

 

[AlexBrown84]

I like analytical posts like these. There are a large number of factors to consider. Imo, what separates geomaxxers from other "passport bros" or sexpats is the prioritization of sexual market value.

SMV has a demand side and a supply side:

• Demand: Go to locations where your own SMV is maximized. Everyone has strengths and weaknesses to their character, like a role-playing game. Go to places where your strengths are emphasized and your weaknesses are covered. If you are tall and buff but have an ugly face, go to places where macho guys are valued (e.g., Latin America). If you are short and frail but have a pretty boy face, go to places where such cuter features are valued (e.g., Japan). It is helpful to think in archetypes. For example, I fit the archetype of "pale skinned, blond hair blue eyes skinny guy". Find what yours is, emulate successful people of your archetype, and travel to locations that suit it.
  
  
• Supply (A/Male): Go to locations where the SMV of your male competitors is minimized. Find places where the desires of women are mismatched with the local supply. For example, the Philippines is a popular destination due to a Supply (A) vulnerability. What is this? The women value tall men with light skin, light hair, and light eyes. The local men are famously short and have dark features. There is no glut of desired features; there is a low Supply (A). Note that the "local supply" can refer to both indigenous people and expats. Overtourism will be an issue for this metric, although I don't personally believe that overtourism is an issue anywhere outside of Thailand.
  
  
• Supply (B/Female): Go to locations where the SMV of your desired female partners is minimized. This is the point that people miss most often. If you like thick girls with tanned skin, go to a place where woman are valued for being thin and having light skin. And vice versa. The relative SMV of the women you will date will decrease as a result. This is the status quo in Asia, but foreigners don't even realize it. If you look around, you will notice many expats dating slightly heavier girls with darker skin. In Western beauty standards, these are high SMV, but in Asia they are low SMV. The expats are taking advantage of the lesser competition from the Asian men as well as the lower self-esteem of their partners.

I wrote this in a bit of a hurry. There is definitely more to consider and everyone will have a different take on it. But in general, if you consider these supply and demand mechanics, you are a geomaxxer. If you think more in terms of monetary discrepancy, you are a passport bro/sexpat.

As the great RR said, you do not travel because the women are different... you travel because the competition is different.

good post