Prostitution, Storks, Rape, and Fast Food

Jade

Well-known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2024
Messages
87
Reaction score
34
This post is an assortment of unrelated topics.

Women are known to orgasm multiple times during sex while men just orgasm once. According to Google, "Some [female] individuals have even reported experiencing a high number of orgasms in a row, with some claiming to have achieved as many as 20." If orgasm is like an object, then prostitution is like giving money to someone who received 20 objects from you and who gave just one object of equal value to one of the twenty to you. Not only does sex not cost anything other than a few minutes, it's actually a gain for the woman since she orgasms so much more than men. So if men pay to orgasm, shouldn't women have to pay 20 times as much to the man? Sometimes the men are much more attractive than women too. Due to these reasons, shouldn't it be women who pay men for sex? Even if a woman doesn't orgasm twenty times, she didn't lose anything other than a few minutes because sex isn't an object. When you give or sell an object, which can cost money, you lose it. When women have sex, women lose no money or object. Sex for women isn't even work since they just lie down and take it.

Prostitution is also bad because poor men can't afford it. Sex should be free for men. Masturbation is like having sex, but with one person. Nobody pays anybody to masturbate themselves, so why is sex sold? Women masturbate and want sex too, so why do they get paid for giving sex?

Also people who have sex don't need to use contraception, which is a waste of money, because the stork theory says that babies come from storks, not women. You might say that the stork theory isn't true because women's bellies become bloated supposedly because the bellies have babies inside of them. The truth is that "pregnant" women(pregnancy is a hoax) are just overweight. Women sometimes just eat too much and get a beer belly, which is confused with pregnancy. Women have fat, not babies, in their bellies. They lose the "pregnancy" because they start to reduce their calorie intake and start exercising. Sure, you might be able to find pictures or videos of "childbirth" which doesn't exist, but they're photoshopped or AI-created videos. Also, more proof of the Stork Theory is that there are single fathers. They don't want you to know the truth about babies because they want to keep the birth rate low, to keep people from having "unprotected" sex, and to keep making money off of "birth control." If you've ever seen a childbirth in real life, it was just child abuse. They forced a new baby delivered by a stork in and out of a woman's loose vagina just to trick you into thinking children come from women.

Perhaps pregnancy and birth are real though, but that doesn't mean sex causes pregnancy and that you should stop having unprotected sex if you don't want more children. Don't blame sex on having children, blame the stork. Frankly, if you want to not have children, you should start having unprotected sex. The Stork doesn't cause pregnancy to those who are anti-natalists and have unprotected sex. The fact that some anti-natalists haven't had unprotected sex is why some anti-natalists have had to get abortions. If an anti-natalist who has unprotected sex gets pregnant, it's probably because she wasn't having enough unprotected sex to prevent it. The stork does cause pregnancy to natalists who have unprotected sex though. The stork works in mysterious ways.

At the outset, I will say rape and kidnapping are wrong and should never be committed.

Also, rape can save a life. Let's say a woman has scheduled assisted suicide this month, but she gets raped. She might reschedule the suicide so that she can accuse the rapist in court. The suicide might also never happen if the rapist kidnaps her and keeps her in his basedment without any blankets, so she can't commit suicide. Rape can therefore be pro-life. Also, even if she doesn't get kidnapped, she might get pregnant from the rape. Pregnant women should be banned from assisted suicide because the preborn child didn't consent to the suicide. Having a child might also make a woman reconsider suicide.

Also, women don't belong in the kitchen. Some tradcucks who are supposedly anti-feminist say women should go back to the kitchen. I don't agree because they are already in fast food kitchens. They've stolen men's fast food jobs. Fast food is good work. Also, men are superior cooks than women. That's why most chefs are men. Also, tradcucks say women should make them a sandwich. The truth is making sandwiches is easy and fast. If I get married, I would want my wife to make me food, but to get a wife I'd need a job. I could work fast food. I wouldn't want her to work fast food or any other restaurant. Instead of telling women to go to the kitchen, they should be told to get out of restaurant kitchens.
 
Not only should women not be allowed to work in fast food, women and girls should be banned from learning to cook. This is like when Confederate slaves were banned from learning to read, which women and girls shouldn't learn how to do either. It should be illegal to teach women and girls
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top