Books Humanae Vitae (1 Viewer)

[National Socialist]

The very serious duty of transmitting human life...has always been for them a source of great joys—joys, however, sometimes accompanied by much difficulty and distress.

They say parents are less happy, but this contradicts that. I don't think I like this encyclical, but I guess "Dont run from suffering, embrace it." And so many other verses

Today, moreover, conditions of work and of housing as well as increased demands both in the economic field and in the field of education, often make the adequate support of a large number of children difficult.

This encyclical feels insufficiently natalist.

Responsible Parenthood

This term sounds like Planned Parenthood

ponsible parenthood is exercised either by the well-thought-out and generous decision to raise a large family, or by the decision, made for grave motives* and with respect for the moral law, to avoid a new birth for the time being, or even for an indeterminate period.

What a concession. At least it's logically against a one-child policy. This encyclical seems to go against The Bible which says children are a gift and therefore something that should be desired perhaps even in large quantities. And many other things.

[E]ach and every marriage act must remain open to the transmission of life.

Don't have sex if you have grave reasons(previous quote) yet NFP is okay.

Also to be excluded, as the Magisterium of the Church has on a number of occasions declared, is direct sterilization, whether perpetual or temporary, whether of the man or of the woman.

This is so contradictory.

Similarly excluded is every action that, either in anticipation of the conjugal act or in its accomplishment or in the development of its natural consequences, would have as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible.

This is against oral sex I guess.

Consequently, it is an error to think that a conjugal act which is deliberately made infertile and so is intrinsically wrong could be made right by a fertile conjugal life considered as a whole.

Contraception is never okay.

If, then, there are serious motives* for spacing births, motives deriving from the physical or psychological conditions of husband or wife, or from external circumstances, the Church teaches that it is then permissible to take into account the natural rhythms

One does not need much experience to know human weakness and to understand that human beings—especially the young, who are so vulnerable on this point—have need of encouragement to be faithful to the moral law, and must not be offered an easy means to evade its observance.

The teaching of the Church on birth regulation, which is a promulgation of the divine law, will easily appear to many to be difficult or even impossible to put into practice.

 

[myeyes]

Can we ban this clanker please?

 

[AlexanderAcolyte]

Can we ban this clanker please?

crazy not insta ignoring him

 

[National Socialist]

Can we ban this clanker please?

I want to geomax.

 

[Yuezhi]

No one cares except for one fedposter apparently about the schizo religiobabble BS that you post here. Are you using this forum to schizophrenicaly talk to yourself or something?

 

[National Socialist]

No one cares except for one fedposter apparently about the schizo religiobabble BS that you post here. Are you using this forum to schizophrenicaly talk to yourself or something?

Maybe we should make a religion sub forum? This is already an off topic sub forum anyways though