Marco Pumpo
40+ countries travelled
- Apr 18, 2024
- 701
- 798
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You are right, agnosticism is the way to go.this is true but atheists are still incredibly dumb
there is a evolution: religion -> atheism -> acceptance of unknown
majority of people are stuck in the middle. Religion and atheism is almost the same shit, because it's driven by ignorance. Very few people reach end stage
if you reach end stage, you will realize that reality is unexplainable because there are no words that can point to it, and there will never be explanation by words
atheism classic phrases:
"if god exist, why he created so much suffering?"
because it's not good or bad from god perspective, it's the same shit. If you were looking from cat's perspective, your understanding of good and bad would be completely different.
"could god just not create evil?"
same answer as before. Also, if evil is destroyed, good is also destroyed. Same coin with different sides. Deleting one side would delete whole thing because whole reality is made of differences. If you eliminate all difference you end up with nothing. Nothing is reality, but there is no concepts, symbols or words that could point to it
"then why create anything at all?"
because if infinity and selflessness exist as absolutes, this would be most logical decision - to create everything
Did you write this as your 72 iq larp or 117?Jesus is God and saves![]()
Reality is absolute. Everything is measurable and thus predictable.if you reach end stage, you will realize that reality is unexplainable because there are no words that can point to it, and there will never be explanation by words
Reality is absolute - trueReality is absolute. Everything is measurable and thus predictable.
Yes, everything physical is measurable. Everything metaphysical is not.Reality is absolute - true
Everything is measurable and predictable - no
unless I don't understand what you mean by everything. If you mean all content within reality, then yes (like in a dream you can measure shit and do science but it won't tell you anything about that you're dreaming). Reality is based on "nothingness", "infinity" or whatever fuck you want to call it, and that thing is not measurable, it's not possible to conceptualize it
true, but problem is that atheist denies that metaphysical exist. "Oh, it's just hallucination". It's very easy for atheist to assume that because countless people talk about bullshit like law of attraction and other nonsense doesn't exist (which they created to fuel their ego minds and selfish beliefs).Yes, everything physical is measurable. Everything metaphysical is not.
if you reach end stage, you will realize that reality is unexplainable because there are no words that can point to it, and there will never be explanation by w
Philosophy is nonsense.Yes, everything physical is measurable. Everything metaphysical is not.
it's not philosophyPhilosophy is nonsense.
'Metaphysics is a type of philosophy or study that uses broad concepts to help define reality and our understanding of it.'it's not philosophy
Prove it, oh wait, you can't. Herein lies the problem.true, but problem is that atheist denies that metaphysical exist. "Oh, it's just hallucination
I was pointing to something more profound, not just mental masturbation, but it's not possible, I tried my best. All words are just pointers/symbols and they're limited, I can't actually point it to you, because "it" can't be conceptualized'Metaphysics is a type of philosophy or study that uses broad concepts to help define reality and our understanding of it.'
If you read my explanation and penetrate your fucking defense mechanisms, you would realize that it's impossible to prove, and it should be that way. You can only experience it yourself, no one is going to show it to you lolProve it, oh wait, you can't. Herein lies the problem.
i'm sure "god" is quite happy with all the sheeple around him who won't question paying church taxes. the most religious people are also the poorest, what a surprise...When you go to hell, make sure to show God these statistics. Maybe he'll change his mind.
interesting take to bring this guy up. indeed he believes in god somehow, but he came up with his own theory and doesn't let himself or his approach get instrumentalized by any of the common religious denominations (christianity, islam etc.):
His stuff lines up with Einsteins belief of god and occult boom belief.interesting take to bring this guy up. indeed he believes in god somehow, but he came up with his own theory and doesn't let himself or his approach get instrumentalized by any of the common religious denominations (christianity, islam etc.):
Langan has developed an idea he calls the "Cognitive-Theoretic Model of the Universe" (CTMU)[5][6][7] which he maintains "explains the connection between mind and reality, therefore the presence of cognition and universe in the same phrase".[8] He calls his proposal "a true 'Theory of Everything', a cross between John Archibald Wheeler's 'Participatory Universe' and Stephen Hawking's 'Imaginary Time' theory of cosmology"[5] additionally contending that with the CTMU he "can prove the existence of God, the soul and an afterlife, using mathematics."[1][4] Even so, Langan does not belong to any religious denomination, explaining that he "can't afford to let logical approach to theology be prejudiced by religious dogma".
i don't know what occult boom is.His stuff lines up with Einsteins belief of god and occult boom belief.
well come on, you had to know that.
This guy is a grifter. He does not have an IQ of 200.
Religion is designed to keep people dumb. This is why I have never understood why the right wants to create a theocratic caliphate if IQ decline is causing the end of civilisation.
yea i agree, the comparison with children fits pretty well.Low IQ are like children. Children need to have someone there to guide them. At first it's a parent. Then its' "god". Otherwis,e Low IQ people get into trouble.
this is rather related to EQ or psychopathy.They have no empathy, or very little remorse.
hm i assume they don't bother thinking that far ahead and instead think something like "as long as i'm alive things will work out for me. and my children will probably have enough money and power to be still fine as well even if civilization declines."Religion is designed to keep people dumb. This is why I have never understood why the right wants to create a theocratic caliphate if IQ decline is causing the end of civilisation.
just checked this guy on wikipedia. i see he got attacked for being racist and sexist. i wouldn't be suprized if some minorities or women got pissed off by his research results and thus tried to cancel him. it seems like the big scientific journals haven't agreed to retract his research.Also JFL at using that 2nd graph quoting Richard Lynn.
exactly.hm i assume they don't bother thinking that far ahead and instead think something like "as long as i'm alive things will work out for me. and my children will probably have enough money and power to be still fine as well even if civilization declines
his IQ of nations dataset (the dataset these charts are referencing) is terrible. Half the countries he guessed their IQ instead of measuring it, the data sampling is also skewed for a lot of countries; some countries he only sampled <100 rural children for a 3rd world country but sampled <1000 middle aged people from the 1st world. It's basically falsified info.however, i didn't take the time to dive deeper into his work to verify if it's legit or not, so i'm not gonna try to defend him or something.
Yes it has its flaws. Guessing IQs based on neighbour country data and children studies seems not very reliable indeed.exactly.
his IQ of nations dataset (the dataset these charts are referencing) is terrible. Half the countries he guessed their IQ instead of measuring it, the data sampling is also skewed for a lot of countries; some countries he only sampled <100 rural children for a 3rd world country but sampled <1000 middle aged people from the 1st world. It's basically falsified info.
no there is proof that low IQ means no empathy and no to little remorse. they did research in a prison. to find the high IQ individuals and the low IQ individuals. Its why niggers have no problem killing other human beings. ESPECIALLY africa.yea i agree, the comparison with children fits pretty well.
this is rather related to EQ or psychopathy.
it makes sense that if the IQ is very low they don't have the computing power to understand how others feel. but if that was really the reason here, how is it possible then that even dogs are able to feel empathy who clearly have a way lower IQ than jailed africans?no there is proof that low IQ means no empathy and no to little remorse. they did research in a prison. to find the high IQ individuals and the low IQ individuals. Its why niggers have no problem killing other human beings. ESPECIALLY africa.
low IQ after a vaccine shot? never heard of that. did you do any other substances? like lots of alcohol or something? or maybe you were just unconcetrated that day, who knows. anyway, 112 is still much higher than average, placed at the end of the scale of the first graph i posted.But i tested mensa 4 times. I am afraid to do the 5th one. first 3 before covid and the jab. 134 to 136. two years after the jab and my employees were making fun of me how much i was forgetting things. Where before i would be able to tell you were you left the screwdriver 3 months ago. without knowing you had used it. but simply walking by an area and seeing it. Did a 4th and tested at 112 two years after the jab. I have never fully recovered.
It was the offical mensa tests. And yes, that is all an IQ test is. It's not questions about mathematics or anything like that.it makes sense that if the IQ is very low they don't have the computing power to understand how others feel. but if that was really the reason here, how is it possible then that even dogs are able to feel empathy who clearly have a way lower IQ than jailed africans?
low IQ after a vaccine shot? never heard of that. did you do any other substances? like lots of alcohol or something? or maybe you were just unconcetrated that day, who knows. anyway, 112 is still much higher than average, placed at the end of the scale of the first graph i posted.
which mensa test did you take? the official one? i only did online tests because the official ones are expensive here and i don't see the point of paying for that. i didn't find the online mensa test particularly useful because it only contained solving matrices which is just one piece in the puzzle of intelligence. also i'm unsure if the time limit makes sense. of course being able to solve problems faster should mean higher intelligence, but with such kind of test you also measure someone's performance under stress to a large degree. you would be more likely to choose a potentially incorrect answer quickly instead of fully thinking it through. there is also a test by "psychology today" that covers a lot more different types of tasks and doesn't have a time limit. my score was a lot higher on that one. again not sure though how meaningful this really is though.
When you go to hell, make sure to show God these statistics. Maybe he'll change his mind.