Geomaxxing and Pro-Natalism

Jade

Well-known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2024
Messages
85
Reaction score
34
I wonder what the best locations are to have a lot of children in. Perhaps countries that have a high birth rate. Perhaps countries that have abortion bans. Abortion is illegal in Malta. Perhaps cities where contraception is banned. I think the Taliban has banned contraception in some cities. Perhaps it's poor countries.


Overpopulation is a Jewish hoax(The author of The Population Bomb is Jewish), but even if it's true, the more people there are, the more people there will be to figure out how to have high birth rates in harmony with the environment.

1000001223.jpg

The saying goes, "the more, the merrier." It is sometimes said that the more children you have the more unhappy you are. The truth is that effect is small and marriage actually makes you happier than being single. Also, you need to factor in the child's happiness. The children are happy they were born. It's a net increase in happiness to make children. In fact, according to Psychology Today, "The average 4-year-old laughs 300 times a day" though I haven't read the article. According to Henryford.org, "Research shows that children smile an average of 400 times per day." Therefore children are really happy and making them increases happiness in the world by a lot.


The less, the unhappier. Many antinatalists say the world is a shithole, but perhaps the cause of their unhappiness is their ideology. The way you feel depends on how you view the world. Natalism is a positive ideology. Also, the less people there are, the more alone people will feel. The more people there are, the less alone they will.
 
Last edited:
There is no ideal birth rate. When the birth rate is high, it can be higher. When it's higher, it can be even higher. There's always too few too children. Even the Amish, ultra-Orthodox Jews, and Salafi Islamists don't make enough.
 
There's enough housing to house multiple times the population. Instead of having regular beds, homes can have bunk beds. One room can even have two bunk beds to allow two to sleep. Parents can sleep on the couch or on the floor. Frankly, children can sleep on the couch too. Parents can sleep on the floor with blankets or in sleeping bags. Therefore a one-bedroom apartment can house at least six people. That's not even packing them like sardines, which is possible and not bad. Frankly, beds can be shared. I used to share a bed with my mom when I was a child.


Even if there wasn't enough housing to house more people than there currently are, the more people there are, the more construction workers there will be to build more houses. Homes can also be in multiple story apartments. There can be many skyscraper homes for those who are serious about pro-natalism.


The same goes for food. Just because there's more mouths to feed, it doesn't mean there will be hunger. In fact, many countries have obesity epidemics. People are eating too much. The more people there are, the more farmers there will be.


Also global warming is a hoax.


Having babies can be addictive. It's like heroin - just once and you're hooked. Many antinatalists are childless, but they shouldn't knock it until they try it.
 
According to Google, "The most densely populated [location] in the world is Macau, China, with a population density of 22,508 people per square kilometer. " United States has a population density of 37 people per square kilometer. 22000 divided by 37 is 594.6. That means United States can hold at least 594.6 times its current population. Frankly, the population density can be even more than Macau's. There's 340.1 million people in the United States. 340.1 million times 594.6 is 202,223.46 million. That's 202 billion people. If the United States had the population density of Macau, it'd have 202 billion people. If Macau can have such a population density, so can the United States.
 
I’ve thought about this. Ultimately I would feel very guilty bringing a bunch of children born to single mums into poverty, but on the other hand your bloodline is the objectively the single most important thing in life and having kids in the west would be dooming it. Son would be a halfie manlet Elliott Rogers ripoff and even having a daughter doesn’t guarantee anything nowadays

But yeah if I was a psychopath I would knock up 20 women in Philippines, maybe Cambodia and Indonesia too though haven’t been there so can’t say
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top