Marco Pumpo
40+ countries travelled
- Apr 18, 2024
- 905
- 1,225
people here usually don't post photos of themselves or their slays. so we have to fall back to x/10 ratings instead, but there are very different perceptions of those. sometimes they are highly subjective and sometimes they refer to different scales people have seen somewhere.
i researched to find a good scale that we can use as a benchmark to refer to when talking about rating women:
no, it's not the classic 4chan image. that one is useless because the examples for the particular ratings are totally different in quality and most are rated too high. must have been composed quickly.
and then there is the "PSL" scale. since this acronym is already put together out of 3 retarded websites, i'm not surprised that the result is retarded as well. i checked on looksmax (yea the website that most of you are coming from) and their pinned explanation post for the PSL scale is ridiculous. most men are rated too low. for an average rating there is christiano ronaldo, referenced as a 5.5 - so that is supposed to be AVERAGE? how mentally damaged do you have to be to believe that? discarded.
the best one i found is the below that got female faces rated in a survey by 1200 men. only downside is that it doesn't cover all races, so it could be difficult to properly rate an asia women for example. if you know a better scale let me know. otherwise i propose to use this one as a reference here in the forum when rating women.
1/10
2/10
3/10
4/10
5/10
6/10
7/10
8/10
9/10
10/10
In keeping with 4chan tradition, there are no automatic 10’s; someone from the 9 category might become a 10 for you, if they meet a specific niche you like a whole lot.
Source: https://aella.substack.com/p/womens-hotness-scale
i researched to find a good scale that we can use as a benchmark to refer to when talking about rating women:
no, it's not the classic 4chan image. that one is useless because the examples for the particular ratings are totally different in quality and most are rated too high. must have been composed quickly.
and then there is the "PSL" scale. since this acronym is already put together out of 3 retarded websites, i'm not surprised that the result is retarded as well. i checked on looksmax (yea the website that most of you are coming from) and their pinned explanation post for the PSL scale is ridiculous. most men are rated too low. for an average rating there is christiano ronaldo, referenced as a 5.5 - so that is supposed to be AVERAGE? how mentally damaged do you have to be to believe that? discarded.
the best one i found is the below that got female faces rated in a survey by 1200 men. only downside is that it doesn't cover all races, so it could be difficult to properly rate an asia women for example. if you know a better scale let me know. otherwise i propose to use this one as a reference here in the forum when rating women.
1/10
2/10
3/10
4/10
5/10
6/10
7/10
8/10
9/10
10/10
In keeping with 4chan tradition, there are no automatic 10’s; someone from the 9 category might become a 10 for you, if they meet a specific niche you like a whole lot.
Source: https://aella.substack.com/p/womens-hotness-scale
